ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Expanding horizons: the feasibility and challenges of tubular retraction in endoscopic transorbital skull base approaches.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic transorbital surgery: a transformative approach to pediatric orbital trauma with functional and structural complications.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndoscopic transorbital skull base approaches are always challenging and require good anatomical knowledge.The aim of this study was to describe the anatomical pathways of endoscopic transorbital approaches and to determine the limitations of these procedures. To evaluate the feasibility of the tubular retractor and the difference with manual retractor.
methodsThe targets of endoscopic transorbital approach were the anterior and middle cranial fossa, mesial temporal region, meckel's cave, petroclival area, opticocarotid region, anterior and lateral walls of the cavernous sinus, etc. Step-by-step anatomical dissections were performed in cadaveric heads using manual and tubular retractors.
resultsAnterior and middle cranial fossa was reached. The branches of the trigeminal nerve, the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, meckel's cave and gasserian ganglion were exposed by manual and tubular retraction using an endoscopic transorbital approach. Access to the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle and the mesial temporal region was more accessible with a tubular retractor. Also, following the anterior clinoidectomy, the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery, as well as, the arteries of the anterior circulation were exposed to gain access the vascular skull base lesions.
conclusionThe endoscopic transorbital approach is suitable for the surgical treatment of many pathologies located in the anterior and middle skull base. It provides direct access to vascular and tumoral lesions. We observed that mesial temporal region interventions are possible with this approach. The transtubular technique may have some limitations, but in selected cases it can provide clear vision without brain retraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40067392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.