Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066935›Full record

SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2025

Influence of outdoor time on the spherical equivalent and axial length in childhood myopia: A meta-analysis.

Clara Martinez-Perez, Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena, José-María Sánchez-González, Cesar Villa-Collar, Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in UK children: Outcomes from a 2-year multi-site interventional trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  4. Prevalence of Myopia in Europe: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clara Martinez-PerezISEC LISBOA - Instituto Superior deEducação e Ciências, Lisbon, Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-5007
Miguel Angel Sanchez-TenaISEC LISBOA - Instituto Superior deEducação e Ciências, Lisbon, Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-1789
José-María Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-7717
Cesar Villa-CollarSchool of Biomedical and Health Science, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Alvarez-PeregrinaDepartment of Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-4581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of outdoor activities in reducing the onset of myopia in children and adolescents by analysing changes in axial elongation and spherical equivalent refractive error. Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024592971), the study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The eligibility criteria targeted children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years with varying levels of outdoor exposure. Primary outcomes were axial elongation and spherical equivalent change. Studies were assessed for quality using GRADE and AMSTAR-2 tools, and data were analysed using Review Manager 5.4, with random-effects models applied when heterogeneity was significant. Fifteen studies (9 RCTs and 6 observational) were included, with a total of 16 597 participants. Outdoor activities significantly reduced or delayed the onset of myopia, with a mean axial length difference of -0.08 mm per year (95% CI: -0.09 to -0.07) and a spherical equivalent difference of 0.16 diopters per year (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.25). These differences were observed after 1 year of intervention and sustained for up to 3 years, with daily outdoor exposure ranging from 40 to 120 min. Heterogeneity was moderate to high, but sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. While higher outdoor exposure appeared more effective in reducing myopia progression, the certainty of this evidence was rated as low due to suspected publication bias, as indicated by the GRADE analysis. Outdoor activities, especially with prolonged exposure to intense light, effectively reduce or delay the onset of myopia in children and adolescents. This study emphasizes the importance of light intensity in maximizing the benefits of outdoor interventions and highlights regional differences in effectiveness, suggesting that environmental factors play a significant role in the outcomes.

Indexed as

Axial Length, EyeMyopiaRefraction, OcularAdolescentChildHumansaxial elongationmeta‐analysismyopia preventionoutdoor activitiesspherical equivalent

Identifiers

PMID40066935
PMCPMC12604451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.