SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2025
Influence of outdoor time on the spherical equivalent and axial length in childhood myopia: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of exercise on myopia in children and adolescents and its modifying factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Influence of outdoor time on the spherical equivalent and axial length in childhood myopia: A meta-analysis.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Pooled it
- Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in UK children: Outcomes from a 2-year multi-site interventional trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Trial
- Prevalence of Myopia in Europe: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Systemic Metabolic and Skeletal Muscle-Related Profiles Associated with Annual Axial Elongation Across Optical Myopia-Control Strategies in Adolescents: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Neuroeconomics and myopia prevention: A framework for public health intervention.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Review
- Myopia as a Global Public Health Challenge a Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Low-Dose Atropine for Myopia Control in European Children: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Refractive status, visual behaviour, and parental myopia in Portuguese schoolchildren and adolescents.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Refractive Errors, Myopic Macular Degeneration, and Associated Risk Factors in a Maltese Population-Based Study.Clinical optometry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of outdoor activities in reducing the onset of myopia in children and adolescents by analysing changes in axial elongation and spherical equivalent refractive error. Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024592971), the study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The eligibility criteria targeted children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years with varying levels of outdoor exposure. Primary outcomes were axial elongation and spherical equivalent change. Studies were assessed for quality using GRADE and AMSTAR-2 tools, and data were analysed using Review Manager 5.4, with random-effects models applied when heterogeneity was significant. Fifteen studies (9 RCTs and 6 observational) were included, with a total of 16 597 participants. Outdoor activities significantly reduced or delayed the onset of myopia, with a mean axial length difference of -0.08 mm per year (95% CI: -0.09 to -0.07) and a spherical equivalent difference of 0.16 diopters per year (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.25). These differences were observed after 1 year of intervention and sustained for up to 3 years, with daily outdoor exposure ranging from 40 to 120 min. Heterogeneity was moderate to high, but sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. While higher outdoor exposure appeared more effective in reducing myopia progression, the certainty of this evidence was rated as low due to suspected publication bias, as indicated by the GRADE analysis. Outdoor activities, especially with prolonged exposure to intense light, effectively reduce or delay the onset of myopia in children and adolescents. This study emphasizes the importance of light intensity in maximizing the benefits of outdoor interventions and highlights regional differences in effectiveness, suggesting that environmental factors play a significant role in the outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.