ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2025
Experience of the surgeon affects the success rate of the placement of orthodontic miniplates.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkeletal Class III patients can be treated with bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) treatment. The placement of miniplates is an invasive operation and needs to be carried out under general anesthesia.
aimThe aim of this retrospective study was to determine the failure rate of miniplates.
methodsAll the patients who had miniplates placed for BAMP treatment between January 2010 and April 2020 in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland were included in this study. The patient records were retrospectively screened. The success rate of the placement of orthodontic miniplates was evaluated between surgical residents (Group 1) and consultant surgeons (Group 2). MATERIALS: The study group consisted of 164 miniplates in 42 patients. The miniplates were divided into two groups, depending on the placement operator. Group 1 consisted of 86 miniplates placed by surgical residents. Group 2 consisted of 78 miniplates placed by consultant surgeons.
resultsIn Group 1 (11 females, 14 males) and Group 2 (16 females, 9 males). The overall failure rate of miniplates was 23.8% (n = 39). The failure rate for surgical residents (Group 1) was 31.4% (n = 27) and for consultant surgeons (Group 2), 15.3% (n = 12) (p < 0.05). Out of all the failed miniplates 69.2% (n = 27) were placed by residents and 30.8% (n = 12) by consultants. LIMITATIONS: This retrospective study consisted of a limited number of patients.
conclusionThe failure rate of miniplates placed by consultant surgeons was lower compared to surgical residents (p < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.