ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Deriving a Mammogram-Based Risk Score from Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for 5-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction From Screening Breast Ultrasound Using Deep Learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Generalizability of an AI-based mammogram risk score (MRS) for breast cancer among diverse populations of women.Science advances · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a task-conditioned multimodal radiology-pathology model for breast cancer staging and biomarker profiling: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) aims to identify breast cancer early when treatment is most effective, leading to reduced mortality. In addition to early detection, the information contained within DBT images may also inform subsequent risk stratification and guide risk-reducing management. Using transfer learning, we refined a model in the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort at Washington University, a cohort of 5,066 women with DBT screening (mean age, 54.6), among whom 105 were diagnosed with breast cancer (26 ductal carcinoma in situ). We applied the model to external data from the Emory Breast Imaging Dataset, a cohort of 7,017 women free from cancer (mean age, 55.4), among whom 111 pathology-confirmed breast cancer cases were diagnosed more than 6 months after initial DBT (17 ductal carcinoma in situ). We obtained a 5-year AUC of 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.78] in the internal validation. The model validated in external data gave an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75). The AUC was unchanged when age and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System density were added to the model with synthetic DBT images. The model significantly outperforms the Tyrer-Cuzick model, with a 5-year AUC of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.54-0.58; P < 0.01). Our model extends risk prediction applications to synthetic DBT, provides 5-year risk estimates, and is readily calibrated to national risk strata for clinical translation and guideline-driven risk management. The model could be implemented within any digital mammography program. Prevention Relevance: We develop and externally validate a 5-year risk prediction model for breast cancer using synthetic DBT and demonstrate clinical utility by calibrating to the national risk strata as defined in breast cancer risk management guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.