ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Postoperative pain after MiniLap percutaneous versus standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: A propensity-matched study.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postoperative pain after MiniLap percutaneous versus standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: A propensity-matched study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy versus those using the MiniLap percutaneous surgical system, aiming to demonstrate the non-inferiority of this ultra-minimally invasive surgical technique compared to the current gold standard.
methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center propensity-matched case-control study. A total of 80 surgical patients undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy for benign pathology were selected, with 40 in each group (MiniLap in group A and S-LPS in group B). Postoperative pain was subjectively reported at 2, 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes of this study were to evaluate differences in the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results.
resultsThe median operative time was 57.7 min (range, 28-125) in group A and 75.5 min (range, 22-180) in group B (P value 0.005). No statistical differences were recorded in terms of estimated blood loss (P value 0.05), length of hospital stay (P value 0.74), complications (P-value 0.31), and postoperative pain (P value 0.06 at 2 h postoperatively). Cosmetic outcomes acquired through subjective assessment by the patient and surgeon at discharge and 1 month after surgery demonstrated a statistically significant higher satisfaction rate in the MiniLap compared to the S-LPS group.
conclusionOur study demonstrates that salpingo-oophorectomy performed with the MiniLap system is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients. Furthermore, this technique has proven to be non-inferior to standard LPS in terms of postoperative pain, blood loss, hospital stay duration, and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.