Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066815›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Harnessing hyperaccumulator plants to recover technology-critical metals: where are we at?

Elizabeth L Rylott, Antony van der Ent

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth L Rylott *Centre for Novel Agricultural Products, Department of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-414X
Antony van der Ent *Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, 6708 PB, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0922-5065

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X011232/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/Y008456/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its inception over three decades ago, phytomining has finally reached the stage of commercial-scale implementation, at least for nickel. Much potential remains to be realised for other elements, notably cobalt, selenium, and thallium, but this requires scientific impetus leveraging recent advances in insights garnered from molecular mechanisms of hyperaccumulation, domestication and agronomic development. These advances will also enable us to (genetically) improve hyperaccumulators for use in phytomining by targeted breeding, as well as synthetic biology approaches.

Indexed as

MetalsPlantsBioaccumulationMetalsbiomasshyperaccumulatormetalsphytominingphytoremediationtransporters

Identifiers

PMID40066815
PMCPMC11982783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.