Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066802›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Phyloformer: Fast, Accurate, and Versatile Phylogenetic Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks.

Luca Nesterenko, Luc Blassel, Philippe Veber, Bastien Boussau, Laurent Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances and opportunities for computational interrogation of plant proteins.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. phyddle: software for exploring phylogenetic models with deep learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca NesterenkoLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0009-0002-5944-2594
Luc BlasselLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-7673
Philippe VeberLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0328-0143
Bastien BoussauLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0776-4460
Laurent JacobLaboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-2719

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-CE45-0017IDRIS AD011011137R1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic inference aims at reconstructing the tree describing the evolution of a set of sequences descending from a common ancestor. The high computational cost of state-of-the-art maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods limits their usability under realistic evolutionary models. Harnessing recent advances in likelihood-free inference and geometric deep learning, we introduce Phyloformer, a fast and accurate method for evolutionary distance estimation and phylogenetic reconstruction. Sampling many trees and sequences under an evolutionary model, we train the network to learn a function that enables predicting a tree from a multiple sequence alignment. On simulated data, we compare Phyloformer to FastME-a distance method-and two maximum likelihood methods: FastTree and IQTree. Under a commonly used model of protein sequence evolution and exploiting graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration, Phyloformer outpaces all other approaches and exceeds their accuracy in the Kuhner-Felsenstein metric that accounts for both the topology and branch lengths. In terms of topological accuracy alone, Phyloformer outperforms FastME, but falls behind maximum likelihood approaches, especially as the number of sequences increases. When a model of sequence evolution that includes dependencies between sites is used, Phyloformer outperforms all other methods across all metrics on alignments with fewer than 80 sequences. On 3,801 empirical gene alignments from five different datasets, Phyloformer matches the topological accuracy of the two maximum likelihood implementations. Our results pave the way for the adoption of sophisticated realistic models for phylogenetic inference.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPhylogenySoftwareEvolution, MolecularLikelihood FunctionsModels, GeneticSequence Alignmentattentionmachine learningneural networkphylogenetic reconstructionregression

Identifiers

PMID40066802
PMCPMC11965795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.