ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Phyloformer: Fast, Accurate, and Versatile Phylogenetic Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of phylogenetic signal in protein language model embeddings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances and opportunities for computational interrogation of plant proteins.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Review
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Deep models of protein evolution in time generate realistic evolutionary trajectories and functional proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Efficient algorithms for simulating sequences along a phylogenetic tree.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- phyddle: Software for Exploring Phylogenetic Models with Deep Learning.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Accurate and Efficient Phylogenetic Inference through End-To-End Deep Learning.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Reasoning Does Not Arise in Standard Usage of Protein Language Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- PhyloTune: An efficient method to accelerate phylogenetic updates using a pretrained DNA language model.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Detecting Interspecific Positive Selection Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- phyddle: software for exploring phylogenetic models with deep learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A quartet-based approach for inferring phylogenetically informative features from genomic and phenomic data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylogenetic inference aims at reconstructing the tree describing the evolution of a set of sequences descending from a common ancestor. The high computational cost of state-of-the-art maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods limits their usability under realistic evolutionary models. Harnessing recent advances in likelihood-free inference and geometric deep learning, we introduce Phyloformer, a fast and accurate method for evolutionary distance estimation and phylogenetic reconstruction. Sampling many trees and sequences under an evolutionary model, we train the network to learn a function that enables predicting a tree from a multiple sequence alignment. On simulated data, we compare Phyloformer to FastME-a distance method-and two maximum likelihood methods: FastTree and IQTree. Under a commonly used model of protein sequence evolution and exploiting graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration, Phyloformer outpaces all other approaches and exceeds their accuracy in the Kuhner-Felsenstein metric that accounts for both the topology and branch lengths. In terms of topological accuracy alone, Phyloformer outperforms FastME, but falls behind maximum likelihood approaches, especially as the number of sequences increases. When a model of sequence evolution that includes dependencies between sites is used, Phyloformer outperforms all other methods across all metrics on alignments with fewer than 80 sequences. On 3,801 empirical gene alignments from five different datasets, Phyloformer matches the topological accuracy of the two maximum likelihood implementations. Our results pave the way for the adoption of sophisticated realistic models for phylogenetic inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.