Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066781›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Understanding the experiences of family, friends and carers attending Recovery Colleges: focus group study.

Bryher Bowness, Sarah Bicknell, Lana Samuels, Yasma Osman, Vanessa Kellermann, Claire Henderson, Vanessa Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryher BownessDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-4958
Sarah Bicknell *Independent Researcher, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-514X
Lana Samuels *Independent Researcher, UK.
Yasma OsmanIndependent Researcher, UK.
Vanessa KellermannDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5969-3769
Claire HendersonDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6998-5659
Vanessa LawrenceDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7852-2018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily and friends (family carers) provide substantial support to those with mental ill health, often affecting their own well-being. Subsequently, family carers have their own recovery journeys. Research highlights numerous benefits of attending Recovery Colleges, but whether these apply for family carers remains unexplored.

aimsWe aimed to explore family carers' experiences of attending Recovery Colleges across England, to understand current provision and how this might better include and support family carers.

methodTogether with lived experience researchers, this qualitative focus group study used collaborative thematic analysis of online focus groups and interviews with family carers and Recovery College staff from across England.

resultsWe generated six superordinate themes: 'The "carer" identity is not clearcut', 'Recovery ethos applies to family carers too', 'Power of lived experience', 'Educational focus is appealing', 'Family carers deserve recognition and provision' and 'Reaching out and fitting around family carers'. Attending Recovery Colleges developed family carers understandings and gave them skills to navigate services and support themselves and others, which furthered their own recovery journeys. Shared learning spaces were helpful, but participants felt these were not always oriented to include family carers. Our findings revealed ways Recovery Colleges could increase their relevance and accessibility to family carers.

conclusionsThe unique characteristics of Recovery Colleges suited the recovery needs of family carers. However, more resources are needed to develop this potential and reach more family carers. Family carer co-researchers enriched our findings, and discussions with the Recovery College community furthered our recommendations for practice.

Indexed as

Coproductionfamily carersmental health recoveryqualitative researchRecovery Colleges

Identifiers

PMID40066781
PMCPMC12001944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.