Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066760›Full record

ArticlePest management science2025

Virulence and biocontrol potential of entomopathogenic nematodes against soil-dwelling stages of the small hive beetle under laboratory and semi-field conditions.

Sitaram Aryal, Alihan Katlav, Clarissa M House, Robert N Spooner-Hart, Michael Duncan, Uffe N Nielsen, James M Cook, Markus Riegler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sitaram AryalHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-7663
Alihan KatlavHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-5478
Clarissa M HouseSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1125-6354
Robert N Spooner-HartHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-7542
Michael DuncanHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8851-7065
Uffe N NielsenHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-7453
James M CookHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-6126
Markus RieglerHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-431X

Funding

Entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agents of important honey bee pests in Australia" (PH21004) is funded through Hort Innovation Frontiers with co-investment from Western Sydney University and contributions from the Australian Government PH21004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe small hive beetle (SHB; Aethina tumida) is a significant pest affecting honey bees and the global beekeeping industry. The harmful effects of chemical pesticides on bee health, non-target species and ecosystems highlight the need for sustainable SHB control methods. Soil applications of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) targeting the soil-dwelling life stages (wandering larvae, pupae and emerging adults) of SHB present a promising biological control approach. We conducted comprehensive laboratory experiments to evaluate the biocontrol potential of 32 Australian isolates of five EPN species (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Heterorhabditis indica, Heterorhabditis zealandica, Steinernema carpocapsae and Steinernema feltiae) against SHB. We also performed a glasshouse experiment testing the efficacy of nine EPN isolates in soil mesocosms that simulated field conditions.

resultsWe demonstrated that all isolates caused mortality in all life stages, with wandering larvae the most susceptible, followed by pupae and adults. Notably, H. indica Hi.HRN caused the highest SHB mortality, while S. feltiae Sf.EG was the least effective. These isolates significantly reduced SHB adult emergence, ranging from 9%-93% in autoclaved sterile soil and 16%-59% in natural soil, suggesting interaction with other soil biota. The isolates H. indica Hi.HRN, Hi.LMBT and H. bacteriophora Hb.HIE2 were the most promising candidates for biocontrol, causing >90% corrected SHB mortality in sterile soil and >80% in natural soil. Additionally, soil application of Hi.HRN caused 33% and 43% mortality of SHB adults after their emergence from natural and sterile soils.

conclusionThe H. indica isolates Hi.HRN and Hi.LMBT displayed strong biocontrol potential, warranting further evaluation. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

ColeopteraPest Control, BiologicalRhabditidaAnimalsBiological Control AgentsLarvaPupaSoilVirulenceBiological Control AgentsSoilAethina tumidaHeterorhabditis spp.NitidulidaeSteinernema spp.virulence

Identifiers

PMID40066760
PMCPMC12159372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.