ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Parturients' perspectives on labor pain and epidural analgesia: A protocol for an explorative qualitative study.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parturients' perspectives on labor pain and epidural analgesia: A protocol for an explorative qualitative study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildbirth is a significant life event often accompanied by intense pain. Although pain perception is highly subjective and influenced by multiple factors, its management is frequently focused solely on pain intensity. Epidural analgesia (EA) is the most effective form of labor pain relief; however, there is limited qualitative research on which aspects of pain relief parturients perceive as successful with EA. Understanding parturients' perspectives on successful pain relief with EA can help improve patient-centered care and enhance labor pain management strategies.
aimThis qualitative study aims to explore parturients' perspectives on successful pain management during labor with EA, identifying key aspects that contribute to their overall childbirth experience.
methodsA qualitative, semi-structured interview study will be conducted at Herlev Hospital, Denmark. Approximately 10-15 parturients who received EA during labor will be recruited using purposive sampling within 24 hours postpartum. Interviews will be recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Data collection will continue until sufficient information power is reached. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (case no. P-2025-18241) and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and data will be anonymized to ensure confidentiality. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The study is expected to generate new insights into parturients' experiences of labor pain and EA, contributing to the development of patient-reported outcome measures and informing future clinical practice. Findings may also support the creation of standardized pain assessment tools and influence policies on labor pain management. DISSEMINATION: Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences to inform both clinical practice and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.