ReviewActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Training and assessment of skills in flexible optical intubation - Protocol of a scoping review.
Review in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ensuring flexible optical intubation skills using a portable virtual reality simulator - a validation study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Training and assessment of skills in flexible optical intubation - Protocol of a scoping review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlexible optical intubation (FOI) is the preferred technique for managing anticipated difficult airways, particularly in awake patients when anatomical factors complicate conventional laryngoscopy. Mastering the procedure requires skills, but a comprehensive overview of the evidence on training and assessment of FOI skills is lacking. There is no evidence-based consensus on educational strategies and recommendations for skill acquisition and retention, thus highlighting a significant gap in airway management training. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence on training and assessment in FOI for future educational recommendations.
methodsThis scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Eligible studies include qualitative and quantitative research focusing on education, technical training, and assessment of FOI skills in clinical personnel with no obligate comparator. Outcomes should be assessable using Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. A systematic literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus, and PubMed. Two independent authors will screen the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Extracted data will be analyzed descriptively, with a discussion on potential biases in the included literature. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). DISCUSSION: The results of this scoping review may serve as a foundation for educational recommendations. By synthesizing available evidence, this review aims to guide future research and policy recommendations for FOI skill acquisition and maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.