Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066623›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2026

Have we reached a new baseline for blood collection and transfusion in the United States? National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey, 2023.

Kelsey McDavid, Rebecca Lien, Joel Chavez Ortiz, Tatiana Bradley, Angelina Luciano, Isabel Griffin, James Berger, Sridhar V Basavaraju, Ian Kracalik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Laboratory Assessment and Clinical Outlook forAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelsey McDavidDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7091-0160
Rebecca LienDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-6894
Joel Chavez OrtizDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9307-5155
Tatiana BradleyDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Angelina LucianoDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Isabel GriffinDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
James BergerOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Sridhar V BasavarajuDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8376-0499
Ian KracalikDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-9466

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from the National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) suggest a stabilization in blood collections and transfusions following years of decline. Data from the 2023 NBCUS were analyzed to further understand national trends in US blood availability. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsIn February 2024, all community-based (53) and hospital-based (104) blood collection centers, and a sample of transfusing hospitals were surveyed. National estimates were calculated for the number of blood and blood components collected, distributed, transfused, rejected on testing, and outdated in 2023, compared with 2021. Weighting and imputation were used for nonresponses and missing data, respectively.

resultsOverall, 96% of community-based blood centers and 85.7% of transfusing hospitals responded. During 2023, 11,586,000 units of whole blood and apheresis RBCs were collected (95% confidence interval (CI): 11,180,000-11,991,000), and 10,328,000 (95% CI: 9922,000-10,733,000) were transfused, a 1.7% and 4.1% decline compared with 2021, respectively. The total available supply (after outdates and rejections) declined by 0.5%. Total platelet units distributed (2618,000; 95% CI: 2483,000-2753,000) and transfused (2220,000; 95% CI: 2040,000-2400,000) increased by 3.6% and 2.1%, respectively, since 2021. Transfusion of pathogen-reduced platelet units (1258,000) increased by 49.2% since 2021. Plasma distributions (3032,000; 95% CI: 2764,000-3300,000) and transfusions (1882,000; 95% CI: 1765,000-1998,000) declined since 2021. Overall, 123,000 units were rejected on testing for transfusion-transmitted infections. DISCUSSION: The 2023 NBCUS indicates further stabilization in the blood supply, suggesting the establishment of a new baseline for blood availability.

Indexed as

Blood BanksBlood TransfusionBlood DonationBlood DonorsHumansUnited Statesblood supplyblood transfusioninfectious disease testing

Identifiers

PMID40066623
PMCPMC12623064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.