SynthesisClinical and experimental dental research2025
Artificial Intelligence in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: An Umbrella Review.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing Traditional Versus AI-Assisted TMJ Disorder Management Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Temporomandibular Disorders Diagnosis: Current Challenges and the Promising Role of Artificial Intelligence.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Deep learning for automated detection and classification of temporomandibular joint disorders: A scoping review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orofacial Pain: Diagnostic and Predictive Performance Across Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Experts in Temporomandibular Joint MRI Interpretation: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multimodal deep learning with anatomically constrained attention for screening MRI-detectable TMJ abnormalities from panoramic images.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Development of AI-based tools for assessing temporomandibular joint disorders using MRI images.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Global research trends in MRI of temporomandibular disorders: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025Article
- Article
- Quo Vadis Temporomandibular Disorders? By 2050, the Global Prevalence of TMD May Approach 44.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesGiven the complexity of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) and their overlapping symptoms with other conditions, an accurate diagnosis necessitates a thorough examination, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Consequently, innovative diagnostic tools are required to increase TMD diagnosis efficiency and precision. Therefore, the purpose of this umbrella review was to examine the existing evidence about the usefulness of artificial intelligence (AI) in TMD diagnosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comprehensive search of the literature was performed from inception to November 30, 2024, in PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases. This review evaluated systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) that reported TMD patients/datasets, any AI model as intervention, no treatment, placebo as comparator and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or predictive value of AI models as outcome. The extracted data were complemented with narrative synthesis.
resultsOut of 1497 search results, this umbrella review included five studies. One of the five articles was an SR while the other four were SRMAs. Three studies focused on patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems as a group, whereas two were specific to temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA). The included studies reported the use of imaging datasets as samples, including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and panoramic radiography. The studies reported an accuracy level ranging from 0.59 to 1. Four studies reported sensitivity levels ranging from 0.76 to 0.80. Four studies reported specificity values ranging from 0.63 to 0.95 for TMJ conditions. However, only one study provided the area under the curve (AUC) in the diagnosis of TMDs.
conclusionsAI has the ability to provide faster, more accurate, sensitive, and objective diagnosis of TMJ condition. However, the performance is determined on the AI models and datasets used. Therefore, before implementing AI models in clinical practice, it is essential for researchers to extensively refine and evaluate the AI application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.