ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Pseudoaneurysm: A Narrative Review and Update for Otolaryngology Residents.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Massive epistaxis due to rupture of Intracranial Internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudoaneurysm is rarely encountered in Otolaryngology emergency but when it does, it requires immediate action. To provide an update on the approach toward diagnosis and management of patients with ruptured intracranial ICA pseudoaneurysm from an otolaryngologist perspective. The PubMed library was searched for previously published reviews, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses for intracranial ICA pseudoaneurysm, and a narrative review was formulated with a focus on Otolaryngology practice. Nasal bleeds that are massive and have a history of preceding sino-nasal surgical intervention, head trauma, sinonasal infection, or head-neck radiation must raise suspicion for bleeding from ICA. The classic triad of unilateral blindness, orbital fractures/head injury, and massive epistaxis is almost pathognomonic for ICA pseudoaneurysm. Digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis. Endovascular interventions such as stenting and/or coiling remain the standard of care for such patients. However, if advanced interventional neuro-radiology units are not available immediately, an otolaryngologist must take action to stabilize the patient, order investigations timely, and control the bleeding. Rupture of ICA pseudoaneurysm requires the collaboration of the Emergency team, Otolaryngologists, Interventional Neuro-radiologists, Neurosurgeons, Anaesthetists, and Vascular surgeons to ensure timely management of such patients. The stepwise approach in this review can act as a guide for managing such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.