Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066382›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025

To Study the Incidence of Biofilm Formation, its Microbiology and its Effect on the Development of Acute and Chronic Rhinosinusitis- A Prospective Study.

Akshat Pandey, Ramraj Yadav, Vivek Mishra, Akanksha Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Saroj, Rahul Yadav, Jeffrey Oswin Rynjah, Srishti Bhansali, Anjalika Sharma, Gundra Chandra Shekar and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Akshat PandeyDepartment of ENT, Rani Durgavati Medical College, Banda, Uttar Pradesh 210001 India.
Ramraj YadavDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Vivek MishraDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Akanksha SharmaDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Sanjay Kumar SarojDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Rahul YadavDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Jeffrey Oswin RynjahDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Srishti BhansaliDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Anjalika SharmaDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Gundra Chandra ShekarDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Sishupal YadavDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Arpit GoyalDepartment of ENT, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Ragini TilakDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005 India.
Sushil Kumar AggarwalDepartment of ENT, Rani Durgavati Medical College, Banda, Uttar Pradesh 210001 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are organised complex structures having polymicrobial nature in a single community, which provide protection to bacteria from antibiotics by various means. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of biofilm-forming bacteria in clinical isolates of acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (ARS and CRS) patients with sinonasal mucopurulence. To know the incidence of bacterial biofilms in patient with ARS and CRS, to study the microbiology of bacterial biofilms in ARS and CRS, to assess the role and effects of biofilm in ARS and CRS and to correlate the association between the formation of the biofilm and development of rhinosinusitis. This prospective study was carried out at a tertiary care centre in Eastern part of India, in which 60 patients were taken as sample size. All patients of rhinosinusitis between age-group of 10 to70 years, who came to our out-patient department, were taken for our study. Biofilm formation was observed in 50% cases and were absent in 50% cases of chronic rhinosinusitis in our study. 83.3% (50) of patients out of 60 patients got improved after treatment and recurrence was observed in only 16.6% (10) of patients. Recurrence was more at 3 months follow-up as compared to follow-up at 1 month, though it was not statistically significant. Though our study highlighted the incidence and role of biofilms in the development of chronic rhinosinusitis, but few more randomized controlled studies involving larger sample sizes should be done to exactly determine the pathophysiological role of biofilms in the development and recurrence of acute and chronic rhinosinusuitis.

Indexed as

Acute rhinosinusitisBacterial colonyBiofilmsChronic rhinosinusitisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40066382
PMCPMC11890489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.