ArticlePersonalized medicine in psychiatry
Cognitive control circuit function predicts antidepressant outcomes: A signal detection approach to actionable clinical decisions.
Article in Personalized medicine in psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on cognitive control circuit and behavioral task performance in hoarding disorder.Journal of psychiatric research · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging for precision medicine in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: We previously identified a cognitive biotype of depression characterized by dysfunction of the brain's cognitive control circuit, comprising the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We evaluate these circuit metrics as personalized predictors of antidepressant remission. Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of data from the international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D) for 159 patients who completed fMRI during a GoNoGo task, 8 weeks treatment with one of three study antidepressants and who were assessed for remission status (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of ≤ 7). Circuit predictors of remission were dLPFC and dACC activity and connectivity quantified in standard deviations. Using established software implementing receiver operating analysis (ROC) we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of these predictors at every cut-point for every circuit measure. We calculated number needed to treat (NNT) metrics for the ROC model identifying optimal cut-point values. Results: ROC models identified maximum separation of remitters (62.5%) from non-remitters (21.2%) at an initial cut-point of -0.75 standard deviations for dLPFC activity and averaged circuit metrics at secondary cutpoints. The NNT was 3.72, implying that if 4 patients (rounding of 3.72) were randomly selected, one would be likely to remit, but if circuit metrics informed treatment, two would be likely to remit. Conclusions: Our findings contribute to identifying clinically actionable circuit measures for clinical trials and clinical practice. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and expand the assessment of longer-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.