ArticleClinical optometry2025
Comparison of Non-Water Proof Mascara Adhesion on the Surface of Different Two-week Frequent Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
Article in Clinical optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cosmetic products, such as mascara, are known to adhere to the surface of silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses (SiHySCLs), potentially affecting lens performance and comfort. However, little is known about how different SiHySCL materials influence cosmetic adhesion. Recent reports suggest that the newly introduced lehfilcon A, a 2-week frequent replacement SiHySCL with Water Gradient and Celligent technology, may exhibit reduced lipid and cosmetic adherence. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of non-waterproof mascara to four types of 2-week frequent replacement SiHySCLs to better understand the impact of lens material properties on cosmetic contamination. Methods: Four variants of SiHySCLs were utilized: samfilcon A, comfilcon A, senofilcon A, and lehfilcon A (with 12 lenses in each category). Non-waterproof mascara was randomly applied in a cross-pattern on the SiHySCL surface using the Latin squares method. Microscopic photography and ImageJ analysis software were employed to assess the proportion of mascara adhering to the SiHySCL surface following a one-hour soak in saline solution. Results: The observed percentages of remaining mascara adhesion on the SiHySCL surfaces were as follows: samfilcon A (3.1±1.7%), comfilcon A (6.0±1.4%), senofilcon A (7.1±1.5%), and lehfilcon A (0.9±0.2%). Notably, lehfilcon A exhibited a significantly lower percentage of adhered non-water proof mascara compared to the other lenses (p<0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that SiHySCL material properties significantly influence mascara adhesion. Among the tested lenses, lehfilcon A showed the lowest level of mascara adherence, suggesting that its Water Gradient and Celligent technology may contribute to reduced cosmetic contamination. These findings provide valuable insights for individuals who wear makeup and use SiHySCLs, as well as for future lens material development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.