ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2025
Analysis of influencing factors and establishment of prediction model for successful vaginal delivery after cesarean section.
Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status of cesarean section in secondary maternal and child health hospitals under new fertility policies: using the Robson classification system.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- "Predictors of failed vaginal birth after cesarean and associated maternal and neonatal outcomes: a case control study".BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Establishment and validation of a prediction model for successful trial of labor after cesarean in scarred uteruses.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the influencing factors of vaginal delivery after cesarean section, establish a predictive model, and identify potential factors for perinatal complications. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of women who attempted a trial of labor after cesarean section(TOLAC) at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and subsequently gave birth in this hospital between 31 December 31 2017 and December 2023. Associations between maternal characteristics and success of TOLAC were assessed using univariate and logistic regression. A predictive model was developed and performance was assessed using the acceptor-operator curve (ROC). Results: A total of 10,277 pregnant women with a history of previous cesarean section were identified during the observation period, 1,065 attempted TOLAC, which 839 were successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and 226 failed vaginal trials. We have developed and validated a simple nomogram prediction model based on common antenatal predictors, which are independently associated with successful TOLAC, including maternal age, height, cervical Bishop score, estimated fetal weight, and use of oxytocin and artificial rupture of membranes to induce labor. The prediction model has been established and verified, and the model demonstrates good prediction efficiency, with an area under the ROC curve of 83.1%. Compared with the TOLAC-failure group and the ERCD group, the VBAC group had the lowest amount of bleeding in intrapartum and 24 h after delivery, puerperal infection, and uterine rupture. Nevertheless, the prevalence of placental abruption and the incidence of neonatal neonatal intensive care unit were higher in this cohort. Conclusion: TOLAC is an important public health strategy in China. The results of our study can be used to improve counselling, reduce decision-making conflicts and increase the success rate of trials of vaginal delivery, ultimately improving the prognosis for mother and baby, by providing case-specific possibilities for counselling and management of women with a history of caesarean section and according to the characteristics of each pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.