ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025
Feasibility study of the implementation of health promoting processes in a secondary school and ways to capture its impact on adolescent lifestyle choices.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Schools are environments that influence adolescent health choices; understanding schools as complex adaptive systems, we have developed a series of processes that are adaptive to the school context, to support schools to create the conditions for health promotion. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of capturing the impact of implementing the health promoting school (HPS) process. Study design: feasibility study. Methods: A purposefully selected secondary school in England, with high Free School Meal (FSM) allocation, was recruited to implement the HPS processes, which includes an annual school audit. We developed a questionnaire, to capture lifestyle behaviours and school culture, completed before the audit and 9 months after. Descriptive analysis analysed the questionnaire responses to understand whether it captured similar responses to the audit. Post intervention interviews with staff and a focus group with students assessed the acceptability and practicality of the intervention and study design. Results: The HPS processes were implemented September 2022-September 2023. Students (n = 337), families (n = 49) and staff (n = 22) completed the school audit in November 2022 and November 2023. 237 students completed The Lifestyle and School Questionnaire at baseline (September 2022) and 210 at follow-up (June 2022). Following the initial school audit, the need to improve the school food was identified and became the school focus; results from the second audit reflected a small positive shift in students' opinion of food provision. It was feasible to capture lifestyle and school culture data using the questionnaire and the same food related priority was captured by the initial questionnaire. However, the timing of the implementation of the changes to the school context meant that this was not captured in the follow up questionnaire results. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that it is possible to administer questionnaires regarding adolescent lifestyle choices in schools. These findings also suggest that it is feasible and acceptable to implement a set of HPS processes. More research is needed to demonstrate an impact on individual health behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.