Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066282›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Size and site matter: the influence of corpus callosum subregional lesions on the magnitude of cross-education of strength.

Marco Morrone, Gianluca Martinez, Antonio Achene, Mariano Scaglione, Salvatore Masala, Andrea Manca, Franca Deriu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02010398 (Neurophysiological, Dynamometric, Functional and Clinical Assessment of the Cross-Training Effect in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02010398 nacompletednot on this map

Neurophysiological, Dynamometric, Functional and Clinical Assessment of the Cross-Training Effect in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità degli Studi di SassariRan2013 to 2017Enrolled45ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Weakness, FatigueArmsCross-Training healthy subjects, Cross-Training multiple sclerosis, Standard-training multiple sclerosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco MorroneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Gianluca MartinezDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Antonio AcheneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Mariano ScaglioneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Salvatore MasalaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Andrea MancaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Franca DeriuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cross-education is an established yet not fully understood phenomenon involving interhemispheric processes within the corpus callosum (CC) that result in strength gains in the untraining limb following training of the contralateral homologous muscles. There is a substantial lack of cross-education studies employing lesional models. This study employed the model of multiple sclerosis, a condition typically featuring demyelinating callosal lesions, to pinpoint CC subregions that mediate cross-education, potentially fostering the mechanistic understanding of the interlimb transfer. Methods: Nine individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (median Expanded Disability Status Scale: 3.5) and focal CC lesions underwent a 6-week, high-intensity isokinetic training program (≥80% maximal effort at 10°/s) targeting their stronger ankle dorsiflexors. Sagittal FLAIR MRI scans were segmented into five CC subregions (CC1-CC5), with lesion volumes quantified for each subregion. Strength (peak concentric torque at 10°/s) was measured bilaterally before (PRE) and after (POST) training to determine cross-education, defined as the percentage increase in torque of the untrained, weaker limb. Correlations between lesion volumes in CC subregions and cross-education were analyzed. Results: Both the trained (+21.5 ± 15.8%, p = 0.002) and untrained (+35.2 ± 24.9%, p = 0.003) limbs demonstrated post-training strength gains, reducing but not eliminating inter-limb asymmetry. Lesions specifically in the rostral body (CC2) correlated with reduced cross-education magnitude (rs = -0.670, p = 0.048) and smaller improvements in strength asymmetry (rs = 0.809, p = 0.008). No associations were detected in other CC subregions. Conclusion: These findings highlight the pivotal role of specific CC subregions, particularly the rostral body, in mediating cross-education of strength. These findings advance our understanding of CC role in the interhemispheric dynamics underpinning cross-education. Routine MRI can identify patients without CC2 lesions who may benefit from cross-education, providing a practical approach to improving muscle strength when weaker muscles cannot be directly trained. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicaTrials.Gov, identifier NCT02010398.

Indexed as

callosal damagecontralateral strength traininginterlimb transferMRImultiple sclerosisrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40066282
PMCPMC11891228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.