Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066244›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Scientometric Study of Mpox and Vaccine Research: Dynamics, Emerging Patterns, and Networking.

Fran Espinoza-Carhuancho, Juan Alvitez, Abigail Temoche, Victor Roman-Lazarte, Frank Mayta-Tovalino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. First Comprehensive Global Bibliometric Analysis of Monkeypox Virus Research Landscape From 1976 to 2025.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fran Espinoza-CarhuanchoAcademic Department, Human Medicine Career Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal Lima Peru.ORCID 0009-0000-4692-942X
Juan AlvitezAcademic Department, Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Unit Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal Lima Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6488-8457
Abigail TemocheAcademic Department, Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Unit Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal Lima Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6196-6413
Victor Roman-LazarteEscuela de Posgrado Universidad Continental Lima Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-5169
Frank Mayta-TovalinoVicerrectorado de Investigación Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola Lima Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-3280-0024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Mpox (Monkeypox) is a zoonotic disease transmitted through contact with infected animals or humans. Recent research focuses on epidemiology, transmission, and vaccine development to combat its resurgence. This bibliometric study analyzed the dynamics, emerging patterns, and networks of mpox and vaccine research from 2019 to 2024. Methods: The literature search was conducted in the Scopus database on August 18, 2024, initially identifying 1278 papers published between January 2019 and August 2024. A specific search strategy was applied to collect documents. The retrieved documents were analyzed using the Scival and Bibliometrix tools to obtain bibliometric metrics. Data analysis was performed using R Studio and Scival. Results: During the study period, 562 sources were identified that contributed to 1278 papers on mpox and vaccine research. These papers show an impressive annual growth rate of 91.49%. Several institutions stood out for their contributions to mpox and vaccine research. The journal Vaccines had 58 publications, followed by the Journal of Medical Virology and Vaccine with 31 publications each. According to Bradford's law, in Zone 1, the journal Vaccines had 58 publications. According to Lotka's law, most authors in the field of mpox and vaccine research have written only one article. Conclusion: These findings highlight the diversity of sources contributing to the mpox and vaccine research literature and highlight the importance of these sources in terms of their scholarly impact and relevance to the research community. This study provides valuable insight into emerging trends and patterns in the field.

Indexed as

bibliometricsglobal public healthMpoxvaccine

Identifiers

PMID40066244
PMCPMC11891071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.