ArticleHealth science reports2025
The Possibility of Health Care Directives for Vaccinations-A Consultation Study With Relevant Stakeholders.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Health care directives allow individuals to express their wishes about future health care treatments if they become unable to communicate their wishes (e.g., due to cognitive impairment). Because vaccinations have become contentious preventative treatments whereby future wishes might not be honored by others, vaccinations should be given specific consideration for potential inclusion in health care directives. The purpose of this project was to explore and receive preliminary feedback on: the idea of vaccination-specific directives; support for draft statements; and practical implications. Methods: We conducted two discrete online surveys with individuals in professions engaging with health care directives (e.g., health care, long-term care, and legal), as well as advocates for older adults, in 2023 and 2024. In the first survey ( Results: Overall, there was broad support for the idea of vaccination-specific directives. In the first survey, 87.2% agreed that it made sense to them. In the second survey, 83.3% of respondents agreed that the proposed statement was clear, with 72.0% indicating "yes" that the statement would result in a person receiving vaccines. Dominant themes across both surveys included logistical challenges with directives; whether wishes would be honored; and the need for public and professional education. Conclusions: Professionals and advocates for older persons indicated significant support for the development and use of vaccination-specific directives. Accordingly, persons who wish to be vaccinated should consider creating such a directive, as it may better advance their wishes and reduce family stress and conflict by providing clear direction in future circumstances-which could include encountering anti-vaccination sentiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.