ArticleCirculation reports2025
Pulmonary Artery Denervation for Medication Refractory Pulmonary Hypertension (PARPH Study) - Study Protocol for a Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm Clinical Trial.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Clinical and Hemodynamic Effects of Pulmonary Artery Denervation in Pulmonary Hypertension Despite Optimized Pharmacotherapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the development of effective pulmonary vasodilators, the prognosis for patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) remains poor, particularly in medication-refractory patients. Catheter-based pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) is an emerging therapeutic strategy targeting the sympathetic nervous system in various types of PH. However, data on its safety and efficacy in refractory patients with PH who truly require non-pharmacotherapy are lacking. Here, we describe a phase II, investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm trial (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs052200017) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PADN over a 2-year observation period. Methods and Results: Twenty participants will be enrolled and will undergo PADN. The primary endpoint is the time from PADN to the first occurrence of the composite events of death, lung transplantation, and worsening of PH. The safety endpoints are the occurrence of adverse events related to PADN and bradycardia requiring treatment. The exploratory endpoints include right ventricular function evaluated using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and Short Form-36 score. Conclusions: The findings of this study will lead to the adoption of PADN for patients with limited treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.