Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066189›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Nephrometry Scores Based on Three-dimensional Virtual Models Improve the Accuracy of Predicting Postoperative Complications After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Results from a Collaborative ERUS Validation Study.

Daniele Amparore, Federico Piramide, Paolo Verri, Enrico Checcucci, Alberto Piana, Giuseppe Basile, Alessandro Larcher, Andrea Gallioli, Angelo Territo, Josep Maria Gaya and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The times they are (still) a-Changin'.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Daniele AmparoreDepartment of Urology AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Federico PiramideDepartment of Urology AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Paolo VerriDepartment of Urology AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Enrico CheccucciDepartment of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Alberto PianaDepartment of Urology AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Giuseppe BasileDepartment of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandro LarcherDepartment of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GallioliDepartment of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Angelo TerritoDepartment of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria GayaDepartment of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Pietro PiazzaDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Stefano PuliattiDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Antonio Andrea GrossoUnit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MariUnit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo CampiUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Laura ZuluagaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ucpinar BurakDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Badani KetanDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Sergio SerniUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Umberto CapitanioDepartment of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDepartment of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alexandre MottrieDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Cristian FioriDepartment of Urology AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Andrea MinerviniUnit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Peter WiklundDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco PorpigliaDepartment of Urology AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: The aim of our study was to compare assessment of PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores and risk/complexity categories via two-dimensional (2D) imaging and three-dimensional virtual models (3DVM) in a large multi-institutional cohort of renal masses suitable for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and evaluate the predictive role of these imaging approaches for postoperative complications. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled from six international high-volume robotic centers, calculating PADUA and RENAL-nephrometry scores and their relative categories with 2D-imaging and 3DVMs. The concordance of nephrometry scores and categories between the two approaches was evaluated using χ Key findings and limitations: A total of 318 patients were included in the study. There was low concordance for nephrometry scores and categories between the 3DVM and 2D assessment methods, with downgrading of PADUA and RENAL scores on 3DVM assessment in 43% and 49% of cases, and downgrading of the corresponding categories in 25% and 26%, respectively. Moreover, 3DVM assessment showed better accuracy than the 2D approach in predicting overall ( Conclusions and clinical implications: In this multi-institutional study, 3DVMs had superior accuracy to 2D images for evaluating the surgical complexity of renal masses and frequently led to downgrading. This could facilitate an increase in recommendations for kidney-sparing surgery and better identification of cases at risk of postoperative complications. Patient summary: Our study shows that the use of three-dimensional models gives lower complexity scores for kidney tumors in comparison to standard two-dimensional scans. This can improve surgical planning and may boost the use of kidney-sparing techniques and better identification of cases that are more likely to have postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Kidney cancerNephrometry scoresNephron-sparing surgeryRenal cell carcinomaRobotic surgeryThree-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID40066189
PMCPMC11891739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.