ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Evaluating diabetes-related nutrition knowledge and dietary beliefs among type 2 diabetes patients in Vidarbha region, Maharashtra: a mixed method approach for insightful analysis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate diabetes-related nutrition knowledge and dietary beliefs among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients in the Vidarbha region, Maharashtra, utilizing a mixed method approach. The study aims to assess the existing gaps in nutritional education and dietary practices among T2DM patients, with a specific focus on understanding gender-based differences in knowledge levels. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed method approach was employed at tertiary care hospital in Vidarbha region, over 18 months. Participants aged 30 years and above, diagnosed with T2DM for at least 6 months, were included. Quantitative data collection utilized structured questionnaires during interviews to assess socio-demographic characteristics and diabetes-related nutrition knowledge. Qualitative data collection involved in-depth interviews to explore participants' perspectives on dietary beliefs and practices, ensuring ethical approval and informed consent. Results: Total 384 T2DM patients participated, revealing significant gender disparities in diabetes-related nutrition knowledge. Male participants exhibited higher awareness levels across various aspects of dietary recommendations. Quantitative analysis highlighted gender differences in knowledge regarding recommended fruit and vegetable intake, milk product consumption, types of fruits suitable for diabetics, inclusion of rice in diabetic diets, alcohol consumption, and recommended salt intake. Qualitative analysis identified key themes related to food choices, meal timing, portion control, dietary restrictions, and cultural influences. Conclusion: The study emphasizes gender-sensitive educational interventions to enhance diabetes-related nutrition knowledge and self-management practices among T2DM patients. Tailored interventions addressing gender-based knowledge gaps are crucial for improving diabetes management outcomes and overall health among T2DM patients in Vidarbha, Maharashtra.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.