Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066108›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Neural tracking of natural speech: an effective marker for post-stroke aphasia.

Pieter De Clercq, Jill Kries, Ramtin Mehraram, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart, Maaike Vandermosten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pieter De ClercqExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-9993
Jill KriesExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ramtin MehraramExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-2228
Jonas VanthornhoutExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Tom FrancartExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Maaike VandermostenExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a stroke, approximately one-third of patients suffer from aphasia, a language disorder that impairs communication ability. Behavioural tests are the current standard to detect aphasia, but they are time-consuming, have limited ecological validity and require active patient cooperation. To address these limitations, we tested the potential of EEG-based neural envelope tracking of natural speech. The technique investigates the neural response to the temporal envelope of speech, which is critical for speech understanding by encompassing cues for detecting and segmenting linguistic units (e.g. phrases, words and phonemes). We recorded EEG from 26 individuals with aphasia in the chronic phase after stroke (>6 months post-stroke) and 22 healthy controls while they listened to a 25-min story. We quantified neural envelope tracking in a broadband frequency range as well as in the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands using mutual information analyses. Besides group differences in neural tracking measures, we also tested its suitability for detecting aphasia at the individual level using a support vector machine classifier. We further investigated the reliability of neural envelope tracking and the required recording length for accurate aphasia detection. Our results showed that individuals with aphasia had decreased encoding of the envelope compared to controls in the broad, delta, theta and gamma bands, which aligns with the assumed role of these bands in auditory and linguistic processing of speech. Neural tracking in these frequency bands effectively captured aphasia at the individual level, with a classification accuracy of 83.33% and an area under the curve of 89.16%. Moreover, we demonstrated that high-accuracy detection of aphasia can be achieved in a time-efficient (5-7 min) and highly reliable manner (split-half reliability correlations between

Indexed as

aphasiadiagnosticsnatural speech processingneural envelope tracking

Identifiers

PMID40066108
PMCPMC11891514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.