ArticleBrain communications2025
Neural tracking of natural speech: an effective marker for post-stroke aphasia.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical speech envelope tracking reflects lesion-symptom profiles in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- A functional systems view on neural tracking of natural speech.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After a stroke, approximately one-third of patients suffer from aphasia, a language disorder that impairs communication ability. Behavioural tests are the current standard to detect aphasia, but they are time-consuming, have limited ecological validity and require active patient cooperation. To address these limitations, we tested the potential of EEG-based neural envelope tracking of natural speech. The technique investigates the neural response to the temporal envelope of speech, which is critical for speech understanding by encompassing cues for detecting and segmenting linguistic units (e.g. phrases, words and phonemes). We recorded EEG from 26 individuals with aphasia in the chronic phase after stroke (>6 months post-stroke) and 22 healthy controls while they listened to a 25-min story. We quantified neural envelope tracking in a broadband frequency range as well as in the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands using mutual information analyses. Besides group differences in neural tracking measures, we also tested its suitability for detecting aphasia at the individual level using a support vector machine classifier. We further investigated the reliability of neural envelope tracking and the required recording length for accurate aphasia detection. Our results showed that individuals with aphasia had decreased encoding of the envelope compared to controls in the broad, delta, theta and gamma bands, which aligns with the assumed role of these bands in auditory and linguistic processing of speech. Neural tracking in these frequency bands effectively captured aphasia at the individual level, with a classification accuracy of 83.33% and an area under the curve of 89.16%. Moreover, we demonstrated that high-accuracy detection of aphasia can be achieved in a time-efficient (5-7 min) and highly reliable manner (split-half reliability correlations between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.