Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40066074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

Reliable machine learning models in genomic medicine using conformal prediction.

Christina Papangelou, Konstantinos Kyriakidis, Pantelis Natsiavas, Ioanna Chouvarda, Andigoni Malousi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina PapangelouSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos KyriakidisGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.
Pantelis NatsiavasInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Center for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioanna ChouvardaGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.
Andigoni MalousiSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning and genomic medicine are the mainstays of research in delivering personalized healthcare services for disease diagnosis, risk stratification, tailored treatment, and prediction of adverse effects. However, potential prediction errors in healthcare services can have life-threatening impact, raising reasonable skepticism about whether these applications have practical benefit in clinical settings. Conformal prediction offers a versatile framework for addressing these concerns by quantifying the uncertainty of predictive models. In this perspective review, we investigate potential applications of conformalized models in genomic medicine and discuss the challenges towards bridging genomic medicine applications with clinical practice. We also demonstrate the impact of a binary transductive model and a regression-based inductive model in predicting drug response as well as the performance of a multi-class inductive predictor in addressing distribution shifts in molecular subtyping. The main conclusion is that as machine learning and genomic medicine are increasingly infiltrating healthcare services, conformal prediction has the potential to overcome the safety limitations of current methods and could be effectively integrated into uncertainty-informed applications within clinical environments.

Indexed as

conformal predictiongenomic medicinemachine learningperspective reviewreliable predictionsuncertainty estimate

Identifiers

PMID40066074
PMCPMC11891349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.