ReviewFrontiers in psychology2024
It's who you know: a review of peer networks and academic achievement in schools.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cultivating equitable academic achievement and enhancing academic functioning for youth is widely seen as one of the main missions of the public education system in the US, but educators may be overlooking critical factors for fully realizing this collective mission. This paper explores the emergent evidence on the impact of friendship and peer social networks on academic achievement and outcomes for students in K-12 public schools in the United States. In total, nine studies have been reviewed and presented. Findings suggest that peer social network selection and influence effects impact individual and group academic functioning and achievement outcomes across age groups in adolescence. Evidence across multiple studies suggests that structural effects and network position may be of special importance, particularly for low-achieving youth. However, due to publication bias issues and methodological limitations, findings should be taken cautiously. Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a quickly growing subfield of education research. There is a great need for more studies in the US, in particular those focusing on historically marginalized and underrepresented student populations (e.g., BIPOC and LGBTQ+ populations, highly mobile student groups, foster youth, students qualifying for special education support and accommodation, etc.). Another major gap identified is the need to focus on specific developmental stages, like elementary school or early adolescence, and varying environmental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.