ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Comparing Different Contrast Injection Methods for Multislice Spiral CT Imaging in Triple-Rule-Out Examinations: A Study on Acute Chest Pain Patients.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The traditional injection method of contrast media (CM) has limitations in terms of volume and imaging quality. Choosing the optimal CM injection method is crucial for ensuring high-quality images and accurate diagnosis in triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO-CTA). This study aims to investigate the application value of combining region of interest (ROI) with CM injection method alterations in TRO-CTA. Methods: A total of 596 patients with chest pain, chest tightness, and dyspnea as the primary clinical symptoms, underwent TRO-CTA examinations based on their clinical symptoms and test indicators. These patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the traditional group, the modified group, and the high-pitch helical scan (FLASH) group. Key parameters, including computed tomography (CT) values, vascular filling contrast numbers, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast noise ratio, image scores, CM volume, CM injection rate, radiation dose of the aorta, pulmonary artery, and coronary artery, were systematically compared across the three groups. Results: The CM volume and radiation doses were significantly higher in the traditional group compared to the other groups (P < 0.05). CT values for the aorta and coronary artery in the traditional group were higher than those in the modified and FLASH group, while CT values for the pulmonary artery were lower in the traditional group compared to the modified and FLASH groups (ALL P-value for traditional group versus FLASH group, P-value for modified group versus traditional group < 0.05, P-value for modified group versus FLASH group > 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of the modified CM injection method and FLASH scanning mode reduces the required CM volume by nearly 30 mL and significantly decreases radiation dose exposure during the examination. This approach shows valuable potential for improving both the safety and effectiveness of TRO-CTA, with significant implications for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.