ArticleCureus2025
An Emergency Department Virtual Observation Unit Fall Prevention Program: A Pilot Acceptability Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Falls are a leading cause of unintentional death among adults aged 65 and above and are associated with significant injuries and healthcare costs. Older adults frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for falls. However, ED clinicians rarely focus on preventing future falls, given the lack of time and resources. We developed a novel multi-component fall prevention initiative embedded in our ED Virtual Observation Unit (VOU) Falls program. Methods This feasibility study, conducted at a level-1 urban teaching hospital, assessed the program's acceptability and safety. The program included home safety evaluations, timed up and go (TUG) tests, and telemedicine reviews of medications. Data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). Patient demographic data and Charlson comorbidities were recorded. Surveys adapted from the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) were administered to patients and providers to assess comfort, effort, fairness, acceptability, feasibility, and safety. Follow-up surveys were conducted at three months to determine changes in fall-risk behaviors. Descriptive analyses were performed to evaluate Likert scale survey data. Results Ultimately, 35 patients were included, with six in the intervention group and 29 in the non-intervention group. Participants felt comfortable with the ED VOU Falls program and found it acceptable, though neutral about its effectiveness in reducing fall risk. VOU physicians (22/30, 73%) found the program fair, feasible, and safe and did not interfere with ED operations or their clinical duties. At three months, no falls were reported in the intervention group, while two (8%) patients experienced falls in the control group. A higher percentage of patients in the intervention group reported actions to reduce fall risk. Conclusion The ED VOU Falls program appears acceptable, feasible, and safe but has a low participation rate. Further work is needed to understand provider and patient concerns regarding participation in order to adapt the program accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.