ArticleCureus2025
Complications After Craniofacial Surgery: A Review From 2012 to 2020.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Mechano-Genomic Frontier: Orchestrating Nuclear Deformation for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Quality of life in patients with craniofacial anomalies: personal experience and review of literature.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT and MDCT Images in Measuring the Thickness of the Posterior Footplate of the Middle Ear in Iranian :.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Craniofacial abnormalities require intensive surgical interventions associated with major risks. This study aimed to analyze how craniofacial surgical outcomes have changed over recent years. Design This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Data was collected from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database. Patients A total of 1730 patients were identified between 2012 and 2020 by searching for CPT code 21175, "reconstruction, bifrontal, superior-lateral orbital rims, and lower forehead, advancement or alteration with or without grafts", in the primary procedure column. Variables of interest included total length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission, and reoperation. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measured was the incidence of postoperative complications. Results The study included 1730 patients, with a mean age of 1.8 + 2.7 years. The most common comorbidities were structural CNS abnormalities (24%), developmental delay or impaired cognitive status (17%), and prematurity (16%). Nearly all patients (N = 1721, 99.5%) had a comorbidity, 1270 (73%) patients required blood transfusion, and 68 (4%) patients experienced another type of complication. The complication rate decreased over time, with 80% of patients experiencing a complication in 2012 and 72% in 2020 (p = 0.008). The mean LOS steadily decreased over that time from 5.3 days to 3.6 days (p < 0.001). The time from operation to discharge also decreased at a similar rate to the total LOS (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in the incidence of readmission (1.9%) or reoperation (2.4%) over time. Conclusions The LOS and incidence of complications have decreased over time, suggesting improvements in craniofacial surgery practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.