ReviewCureus2025
Efficacy of AI Models in Detecting Heart Failure Using ECG Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Within a Heartbeat: A Machine Learning Approach Using VCG for Heart Failure Assessment in Sinus Rhythm.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence electrocardiography for left ventricular systolic dysfunction demonstrates preserved performance across demographic training imbalances.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- The Evolving Utility of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools for the Detection of Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: From Potential to Implementation.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography for the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is the most common cause of death worldwide, characterized by low ejection fraction, substantial mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present a promising avenue for enhancing diagnostic precision, particularly in the analysis of electrocardiogram (ECG) data. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic performance of AI models in detecting HF using ECG data. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception up to July 1, 2023, to identify original articles assessing the predictive ability of AI in HF diagnosis. A total of 218,202 participants were included, with individual studies ranging from 59 to 110,000 participants. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the 13 included studies, with a 97.5% confidence interval (CI), were 0.93 (CI: 0.81-0.98), 0.95 (CI: 0.89-0.97), and 303.65 (CI: 53.12-1734), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.12 to 1.00 and 0.66 to 1.00, respectively, indicating substantial variability in AI model performance, which may impact their generalizability and clinical reliability. AI-based algorithms utilizing ECG data are a reliable, accurate, and promising tool for the screening, detection, and monitoring of HF. However, further prospective studies are needed, particularly randomized controlled trials and large-scale longitudinal studies across diverse populations, to evaluate the long-term clinical impact, generalizability, and real-world applicability of these AI-driven diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.