ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating the Link Between Preoperative Comorbidities and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Urological Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTaking into consideration both the increasing number of elderly patients undergoing surgery and the fragility of this particular category of patients, a decisive step towards more effectively balancing venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding risk is the development of a reliable predicting tool. The aim of this study is to appraise the relationship between comorbidity assessment tools and VTE risk assessment models (RAMs) in patients undergoing urological procedures.
methodsData were prospectively collected during a 20-month period (March 2021-October 2022) including 136 urologic inpatients with a mean age of 66.4 (± 14.4) years. Patients' medical records were reviewed in order to evaluate the comorbidities using the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (AA-CCI), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and Index of Co-Existent Diseases (ICED). Venous thromboembolism risk was assessed through the European Association of Urology (EAU) RAM, American Urological Association (AUA) RAM, and Caprini score.
resultsStatistical analysis indicated the presence of a statistically significant relationship between all comorbidity scores and VTE RAMs, with only the CIRS score showing no significant deviations across the EAU RAM risk groups (p=0.111). The positive Kendall's Tau-b coefficient values manifest a positive monotonic relationship between the two variables, meaning that higher comorbidity scores correspond to higher VTE risk categories.
conclusionComorbidity scores and VTE RAMs demonstrate a high degree of concordance. This finding suggests that EAU and AUA RAMs, irrespective of their simplicity, can effectively incorporate underlying health conditions and constitute reliable alternatives to the more complex Caprini score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.