ArticleCureus2025
Two Japanese Cases of Breast Cancer That Developed Pembrolizumab-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report two cases of adrenal insufficiency (AI) occurring during neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab for breast cancer. In the first case, a 53-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of poor oral intake and fatigue. In the second case, a 46-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of fever, poor oral intake, and general fatigue and was admitted with a diagnosis of pneumonia. Her symptoms did not improve during treatment for pneumonia. After that, two patients were diagnosed with pembrolizumab-induced adrenal insufficiency and were treated with hydrocortisone with improvement in their symptoms. AI due to pembrolizumab use is a relatively rare adverse event, but if it is detected late, it can be potentially life-threatening. In both cases, there were clear changes in the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade at the time of diagnosis of AI. It may be useful for early detection of AI. The CTCAE version 5.0 was used to assess the severity of adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.