ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Prevention of pneumococcal infections: Impact of structured medico-pharmaceutical collaborative management to improve vaccination coverage of at-risk patients (OPTIVACC study): Protocol for a multicenter randomized stepped -wedge study.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05060146 (Prevention of Pneumococcal Infections), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prevention of Pneumococcal Infections: Impact Collaborative Medico-pharmaceutical Care Structured to Improve Vaccination Coverage of Patients at Risk.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: This study is a multicentric stepped-wedged randomized trial involving 12 units in 9 French hospitals (3 university and 6 local) during 4 periods of 90 days each. Three clusters will be made, each composed randomly of clinical and surgical units from one university hospital and clinical and surgical units of 2 local hospitals. For each period, one unit will have to include 16 non-vaccinated inpatients at risk of IPD. Patients in the control phase will receive usual care. During the interventional phase, the pharmacist will inform the physician on PV necessity, who will report recommendation and prescribe it at discharge. The pharmacist will perform a consultation and send a discharge letter to the patient's community pharmacist. The primary outcome will assess the impact of intervention on PV coverage after 6 months. Secondary outcomes will evaluate vaccines dispensing, uncompleted protocol rate and intervention process. A subgroup analysis between university and local hospitals and clinical and surgical units, respectively will be made. Discussion: This study will assess the impact of medico-pharmaceutical collaboration in hospital on PV coverage in inpatients at risk of IPD. Hospitalization could be a way to promote vaccination and enhance healthcare system performance. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05060146. Registered on September 16th, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.