ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on "Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference".North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- What does the US public think of scoliosis: a comprehensive crowd-sourced study of perceptions about adult spinal deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Public awareness and understanding of spine surgery techniques can influence patient decision-making and outcomes. Healthcare organizations often market these techniques, but the public's comprehension and perceptions of these procedures remain unclear. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted via an online platform. The target population was the general United States population, with filters set for English-speaking participants aged 18 and older, and a Prolific approval rating of 80-100%. The survey collected demographic data and responses on awareness of spine surgery techniques, understanding of these techniques, perceived effectiveness, personal preferences, concerns, and decision-making processes in surgeon selection. Multivariate linear regression was employed to analyze the influence of demographic variables on surgical preferences. Results: High awareness was observed for spinal fusion (76.9%) and disc replacement (79.3%), while terms like laminectomy (19.7%) and AR-assisted spine surgery (10.9%) were less known. "Robotic spine surgery" and "disc replacement" were perceived as the most efficacious. ``Minimally invasive'' techniques and "laser spine surgery" were the preferred choices. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, insurance type, income, and location significantly influenced surgical preferences. Concerns about surgical complications (87%) and recovery time (68.1%) were prevalent. Social media, particularly YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook, were primary information sources. Surgeon selection was mainly influenced by professional recommendations and hospital reputations. Conclusions: The study identifies significant gaps in public knowledge of spine surgery techniques and underscores the need for targeted educational initiatives to improve patient understanding and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.