Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065829›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025

Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference.

Alejandro Perez-Albela, John Hanna, Alan H Daniels, Bryce A Basques

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alejandro Perez-AlbelaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
John HannaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Alan H DanielsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Bryce A BasquesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public awareness and understanding of spine surgery techniques can influence patient decision-making and outcomes. Healthcare organizations often market these techniques, but the public's comprehension and perceptions of these procedures remain unclear. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted via an online platform. The target population was the general United States population, with filters set for English-speaking participants aged 18 and older, and a Prolific approval rating of 80-100%. The survey collected demographic data and responses on awareness of spine surgery techniques, understanding of these techniques, perceived effectiveness, personal preferences, concerns, and decision-making processes in surgeon selection. Multivariate linear regression was employed to analyze the influence of demographic variables on surgical preferences. Results: High awareness was observed for spinal fusion (76.9%) and disc replacement (79.3%), while terms like laminectomy (19.7%) and AR-assisted spine surgery (10.9%) were less known. "Robotic spine surgery" and "disc replacement" were perceived as the most efficacious. ``Minimally invasive'' techniques and "laser spine surgery" were the preferred choices. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, insurance type, income, and location significantly influenced surgical preferences. Concerns about surgical complications (87%) and recovery time (68.1%) were prevalent. Social media, particularly YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook, were primary information sources. Surgeon selection was mainly influenced by professional recommendations and hospital reputations. Conclusions: The study identifies significant gaps in public knowledge of spine surgery techniques and underscores the need for targeted educational initiatives to improve patient understanding and decision-making.

Indexed as

MarketingOnline surveyPatient perceptionsPublic awarenessSpine proceduresSpine techniques

Identifiers

PMID40065829
PMCPMC11891707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.