ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Hybrid Reconstruction Surgery & Rehabilitation in the Overhead Athlete.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suture Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Detailed Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Interval Throwing Programs of Various Duration for Baseball Players Based on Biomechanical Workload Data.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Radial, Median and Ulnar Nerve Flossing as Essential Preparatory Treatment for Baseball Pitchers in the Prevention of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury: A Clinical Suggestion.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- Ulnar Collateral Ligament Hybrid Reconstruction With Palmaris Longus Autograft, Suture Brace Augmentation, and Ulnar Nerve Transposition.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injuries to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), have become increasingly prevalent among overhead-throwing athletes, especially baseball pitchers. From 2011 to 2023, UCL injuries were the most common injury in Major League Baseball (MLB). Contributing factors include high pitching velocity, fatigue, overuse, and year-round pitching. Research indicates that 25% of MLB pitchers and 14% of Minor League pitchers have undergone UCL surgery, with these numbers steadily rising. After traditional UCL reconstruction, 83% of athletes return to the same or higher levels of play. While the success rate for UCL surgery is high, revision surgeries are becoming more frequent, with mixed outcomes. This underscores the need for improved surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies. The hybrid UCL reconstruction technique presents a reliable and effective solution for treating UCL injuries, combining the benefits of autogenous grafting with internal brace augmentation. Current research, however, lacks focus on the surgical technique and rehabilitation following UCL hybrid surgery. Achieving successful outcomes with this procedure relies on a collaborative approach, from surgery to rehabilitation with adherence to the rehabilitation protocol and throwing program. Full recovery typically requires 12-14 months, depending on the athlete's level of play. With over 400 successful surgeries to date, this technique has proven to enhance stability and facilitate recovery, particularly in elite-level throwing athletes. The purpose of this paper is to describe this new surgical technique and its associated rehabilitation programs, emphasizing the importance of rehabilitation under the guidance of a rehabilitation professional experienced with overhead athletes. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.