ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Resolving phylogenetic conflicts in Pandanales: the dual roles of gene flow and whole-genome duplication.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Episode clustering in phylogenetic networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Concatenation, Conflict, and Complexity: Genealogical Heterogeneity Mimics Substitutional Heterogeneity for Nucleotide Model Selection.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- A telomere-to-telomere reference genome for Stemona tuberosa.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate phylogenetic reconstruction is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships and biodiversity. Despite advances in molecular systematics, the relationships within Pandanales-which include Cyclanthaceae, Pandanaceae, Stemonaceae, Triuridaceae, and Velloziaceae-remain unresolved. This study aims to clarify these relationships by analyzing transcriptomic and genomic data from these families. Methods: We analyzed transcriptomic and genomic data from 20 samples representing all five families of Pandanales. Our approach involved assembling 2,668 single-copy orthologous genes (SCOGs) and conducting phylogenetic analyses using both coalescent- and concatenation-based methods, alongside plastid genome data. Additionally, we employed HyDe for gene flow analysis and conducted coalescent simulations and QuIBL analyses to explore sources of phylogenetic conflict. We also investigated whole-genome duplication (WGD) events within Pandanales. Results: The phylogenetic analyses produced strongly supported but topologically incongruent trees. Our gene flow analysis suggested that the concatenation-based topology likely reflects the true evolutionary history of Pandanales. We identified two significant ancient gene flow events: one between Velloziaceae and Triuridaceae, and another between Triuridaceae and the C-P clade (Cyclanthaceae + Pandanaceae). Furthermore, we detected five whole-genome duplication (WGD) events, including two that occurred before the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in Stemonaceae and Pandanaceae, one in Triuridaceae during the mid-Paleogene, and two within Velloziaceae near the Paleogene-Neogene boundary. Discussion: Our findings indicate that gene flow, rather than incomplete lineage sorting, is the primary source of phylogenetic conflict at certain nodes within Pandanales. The identified WGD events likely played a significant role in facilitating adaptation and diversification under changing environmental conditions. These results not only resolve long-standing phylogenetic conflicts but also enhance our understanding of the mechanisms driving plant diversification within this order.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.