Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065754›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025

Health status among women and men in Canada who reported experiences of non-physical intimate partner violence, Canada.

Margot Shields, Lil Tonmyr, Nathaniel J Pollock, Andrea Gonzalez, Britt McKinnon, Divya Joshi, Lindsay Crompton, Harriet L MacMillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margot ShieldsFamily Violence Epidemiology Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lil TonmyrFamily Violence Epidemiology Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nathaniel J PollockFamily Violence Epidemiology Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Britt McKinnonFamily Violence Epidemiology Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Divya JoshiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay CromptonFamily Violence Epidemiology Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Harriet L MacMillanDepartments of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, and of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is recognized as a public health problem that has profound negative consequences for physical and mental health and well-being. Previous research has focused primarily on physical and sexual IPV; non-physical IPV has been understudied, particularly among men. Methods: Using data from Statistic Canada's 2018 Survey of Safety in Public and Private Spaces, we examined associations between non-physical IPV and nine heath status variables: fair/poor mental health, fair/poor general health, dissatisfaction with life, pain, use of medication, suicidal thoughts, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and PTSD. Results: Women (13.3 %) and men (12.6 %) were equally likely to report non-physical IPV in the past year, often without co-occurring physical/sexual IPV. Bivariate analyses revealed that non-physical IPV increased the risk of reporting all negative health status variables except pain. When associations were examined in relation to the frequency of non-physical IPV, a gradient was observed. In multivariable analyses that controlled for potential confounders, most associations observed in the bivariate analyses persisted, but associations were somewhat attenuated when controlling for co-occurring physical/sexual IPV. Conclusions: Non-physical IPV, particularly if it happens frequently, is strongly associated with negative health, often independent of co-occurring physical/sexual IPV. Longitudinal studies have found that non-physical IPV is a predictor of subsequent physical/sexual IPV, further increasing the risk of negative health. This underscores the importance of specifically addressing non-physical IPV through public health prevention programs and the need for it to be recognized as a form of IPV that is as important as physical and sexual IPV.

Indexed as

Controlling behavioursDomestic violenceEconomic abuseEmotional abuseFamily violenceGender-based violencePsychological abuse

Identifiers

PMID40065754
PMCPMC11891695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.