Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065744›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2025

Advancing bryophyte research and conservation: a case study on Madagascar.

Lovanomenjanahary Marline, Ny Aina Sedera Ranaivoson, Rhian J Smith, Claudine Ah-Peng, Terry A J Hedderson, Nicholas Wilding, Alexandre Antonelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lovanomenjanahary MarlineRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6181-0440
Ny Aina Sedera RanaivosonKew Madagascar, Lot VA 19 L Tsiadana, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar.
Rhian J SmithRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2836-0246
Claudine Ah-PengUMR PVBMT, Université de La Réunion, Saint-Pierre 97410, La Réunion, France.ORCID 0009-0008-9208-514X
Terry A J HeddersonBolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-6599
Nicholas WildingUMR PVBMT, Université de La Réunion, Saint-Pierre 97410, La Réunion, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4029-5387
Alexandre AntonelliRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-9297

Funding

National Geographic Society NGS-72178R-2Swedish Research Council 2019-05191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBryophytes are a group of plants that are ecologically important and diverse, with many undescribed species. Madagascar is well known for its charismatic species, though less conspicuous groups, such as bryophytes, are virtually unknown to the public and the scientific community. Bryophyte diversity is a highly overlooked component of Madagascar's rich biodiversity, underlined by geographical sampling biases, sparse representation in natural history collections, and an evident research and conservation deficit compared to more charismatic groups. With significant work to do in bryophyte research and conservation, Madagascar can serve as a model for addressing knowledge gaps and tackling the global issue, which we propose calling 'bryophyte blindness'. Here we summarise historical research and current knowledge on the diversity, distribution and conservation status of Malagasy bryophytes, address the issue of bryophyte blindness and propose future directions. We recognise 1186 bryophyte species and 152 infraspecific taxa distributed among 95 families and 285 genera, with 33.4 % of mosses and 17.4 % of liverworts restricted to the island. By computing species accumulation curves, we expect substantial increases in future years. SCOPE: To advance research and ensure the effective conservation of bryophytes, it is crucial to build robust foundations for their study and appreciation. Investments in herbarium collections paired with leveraging technology and resources for identification, including an image bank and DNA barcodes, will facilitate taxonomic revisions, and evolutionary and ecological research. Addressing geographical imbalances, such as through increased sampling in arid and dry regions, and fostering comprehensive research to elevate the scientific and public appreciation of bryophytes are key to advancing the integration of bryophytes into national, regional and global conservation initiatives. Key prospects include research on ecosystems with high and/or endemic bryophyte diversity, facilitating the integration of bryophytes into conservation programmes. Training a new generation of students and professionals on bryophytes is an imperative underlying all these initiatives and requires significant investment. It is crucial to fostering more equitable research and conservation in countries like Madagascar and helping to tackle bryophyte blindness in science and society.

conclusionsBryophytes need urgent research and conservation investments. Researchers, organisations, governments and universities should collaborate to raise scientific and public awareness of their importance. Addressing key questions about bryophyte diversity, threats and conservation requires a holistic, collaborative and inclusive approach to bryophyte research.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBryophytaConservation of Natural ResourcesMadagascarBryophyteconservationliverwortMadagascarmosssampling bias

Identifiers

PMID40065744
PMCPMC12401876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.