Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065741›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Applying machine learning to predict bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients for colonoscopy: development and validation of a web-based prediction tool.

Jianying Liu, Wei Jiang, Yahong Yu, Jiali Gong, Guie Chen, Yuxing Yang, Chao Wang, Dalong Sun, Xuefeng Lu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianying LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Yahong YuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Jiali GongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Guie ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Yuxing YangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Chao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Dalong SunDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Xuefeng LuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate bowel preparation is crucial for effective colonoscopy, especially in elderly patients who face a high risk of inadequate preparation. This study develops and validates a machine learning model to predict bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients before colonoscopy.

methodsThe study adhered to the TRIPOD AI guidelines. Clinical data from 471 elderly patients collected between February and December 2023 were utilized for developing and internally validating the model, while 221 patients' data from March to June 2024 were used for external validation. The Boruta algorithm was applied for feature selection. Models including logistic regression, light gradient boosting machines, support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, random forests, and extreme gradient boosting were evaluated using metrics such as AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The SHAP algorithm helped rank feature importance. A web-based application was developed using the Streamlit framework to enhance clinical usability.

resultsThe Boruta algorithm identified 7 key features. The SVM model excelled with an AUC of 0.895 (95% CI: 0.822-0.969), and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. In external validation, the SVM model maintained robust performance with an AUC of 0.889. The SHAP algorithm further explained the contribution of each feature to model predictions.

conclusionThe study developed an interpretable and practical machine learning model for predicting bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients, facilitating early interventions to improve outcomes and reduce resource wastage.

Indexed as

CatharticsColonoscopyMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInternetLogistic ModelsMaleSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector MachineCatharticsbowel preparationcolonoscopyElderly patientsmachine learningpredictive model

Identifiers

PMID40065741
PMCPMC11899208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.