ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2025
The 2024 Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Future Directions of Korea's Bioethics and Safety Act.
Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CT-free kidney single-photon emission computed tomography for glomerular filtration rate.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In October 2024, the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) underwent comprehensive updates that incorporated feedback from global experts and stakeholders. The revised DoH continues to serve as a cornerstone for international and national regulations on medical research ethics. This paper aims to delve into the 2024 amendments to DoH and assesses their impact on South Korea's Bioethics and Safety Act (Bioethics Act). This paper analyses the congruences and gaps between the revised DoH and the current Bioethics Act, examining the alignment and gaps between the current Bioethics Act and the revised DoH. This study identified necessary revisions to enhance the ethical conduct of medical research in Korea in accordance with international standards. A comparison between the principles of the revised DoH and the provisions of the Bioethics Act revealed essential adjustments required to align the Bioethics Act with updated ethical guidelines. These findings underscore the broader implications for Korea's regulatory framework on human research ethics, emphasizing the need for a strategic integration of global ethical standards into the country's legal structure. The revised DoH emphasizes the active role of research participants and the fair inclusion of vulnerable groups. In Korea, the Bioethics Act, last revised in 2013, aligns closely with the DoH but requires further updates to reflect the 2024 amendments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.