Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065712›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025

Neutralizing Activity and T-Cell Responses Against Wild Type SARS-CoV-2 Virus and Omicron BA.5 Variant After Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Booster Dose in PLWH Receiving ART Based on CD4 T-Cell Count.

Na Young Ha, Ah-Ra Kim, Hyeongseok Jeong, Shinhye Cheon, Cho Rong Park, Jin Ho Choe, Hyo Jung Kim, Jae Won Yoon, Miryoung Kim, Mi Yeong An and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Na Young Ha *Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-2548
Ah-Ra Kim *Division of Clinical Research for Vaccine, Center for Vaccine Research, Korea National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-3787
Hyeongseok JeongEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-079X
Shinhye CheonEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-121X
Cho Rong ParkEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8185-2384
Jin Ho ChoeEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1274-2197
Hyo Jung KimEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6998-8149
Jae Won YoonEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-7136
Miryoung KimEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2918-978X
Mi Yeong AnEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-2915
Sukyoung JungDepartment of Health Care Policy Research, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Sejong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-2158
Hyeon Nam DoDivision of Clinical Research for Vaccine, Center for Vaccine Research, Korea National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9337-8859
Junewoo LeeDivision of Clinical Research for Vaccine, Center for Vaccine Research, Korea National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-5597
Yeon-Sook KimEmerging Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-5488

Funding

Korea National Institute of Health 2021ER260600National Research Foundation of Korea 2021M3E5E3080533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific humoral and cellular responses for up to 6 months after the 3rd dose of ancestral coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in people living with HIV (PLWH) and healthy controls (HCs) who were not infected with COVID-19.

methodsAnti-spike receptor-binding domain IgG (anti-RBD IgG) concentrations using chemiluminescence immunoassay and neutralizing antibodies using focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT) were assessed at 1 week after each dose of vaccination, and 3 and 6 months after the 3rd dose in 62 PLWH and 25 HCs. T-cell responses using intracellular cytokine stain were evaluated at 1 week before, and 1 week and 6 months after the 3rd dose.

resultsAt 1 week after the 3rd dose, adequate anti-RBD IgG (> 300 binding antibody unit /mL) was elicited in all PLWH except for one patient with 36 CD4 T-cell count/mm³. The geometric mean titers of 50% FRNT against wild type (WT) and omicron BA.5 strains of SARS-CoV-2 in PLWH with CD4 T-cell count ≥ 500 cells/mm³ (high CD4 recovery, HCDR) were comparable to HC, but they were significantly decreased in PLWH with CD4 T-cell count < 500/mm³ (low CD4 recovery, LCDR). After adjusting for age, gender, viral suppression, and number of preexisting comorbidities, CD4 T-cell counts < 500/mm³ significantly predicted a poor magnitude of neutralizing antibodies against WT, omicron BA.5, and XBB 1.5 strains among PLWH. Multivariable linear regression adjusting for age and gender revealed that LCDR was associated with reduced neutralizing activity (

conclusionHCDR demonstrated robust humoral and cell-mediated immune responses after a booster dose of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, whereas LCDR showed diminished immune responses against WT virus and more impaired cross-neutralization against omicron BA.5 strain.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHIV InfectionsSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesAdultAntibodies, ViralCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusCellular ImmunityCOVID-19 VaccinesHIVNeutralizing Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID40065712
PMCPMC11893351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.