Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065653›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Coproducing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measurement Burst Mental Health Study With Young People: The MHIM Coproduction Protocol.

Luke Power, Tong Xie, Thomas Bartlett, Dejla Hoxha, Heather Bryson, Eva Drummond, Poppy Fairbairn, Alex Swan, Yu-Wen Tan, Lorna Caddick and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co-Production Panel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. 'Co-Production Is Caring': Young People's Reflections on Responsible and Dialogic Co-Production in Youth Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luke PowerSchool of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Tong XieFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3958-0554
Thomas BartlettSchool of Social and Political Sciences, Social Work Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Dejla HoxhaSchool of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Heather BrysonExpert by Experience, Member of pre-study YPAG, Scotland.
Eva DrummondExpert by Experience, Member of pre-study YPAG, Scotland.
Poppy FairbairnExpert by Experience, Member of pre-study YPAG, Scotland.
Alex SwanExpert by Experience, Member of pre-study YPAG, Scotland.
Yu-Wen TanExpert by Experience, Member of pre-study YPAG, Scotland.
Lorna CaddickDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Aja MurraySchool of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Funding

This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust (project number: 225364Z/22).Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 225364Z/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is now widespread recognition within adolescence mental health research of the ethical imperative and benefits of coproduction. This has led to the development of best practice guidelines and the routine reporting of coproduction methods. However, there are unique considerations associated with involving young people in research with varying designs, e.g., longitudinal. Ideally, these decisions are made in consultation with young people themselves. Thus, the objective and novel contribution of this paper is (1) the involvement of young people in the development of the MHIM protocol, including an evaluative framework, and (2) a study protcol that utilises coproduction in the context of a longitudinal mental health project.

methodsWe present a coproduction protocol (MHIM-YPAG), developed with young people (pre-study YPAG), that describes the planned approach to involving young people in the MHIM study. MHIM will use an accelerated longitudinal-cohort design that will combine ecological momentary assessment, bio-sampling, radar-based sleep measurement and online questionnaires to examine the relationship between daily-life-experiences and adolescence mental health. The protocol describes how young people will be involved in MHIM and how impact will be evaluated. Within this context, coproduction relates to (1) the codevelopment, with young people, of the study's structure and (2) their involvement as researchers, e.g., recruitment, data interpretation and knowledge-exchange. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: As one of the first protocols of its kind, our coproduction protocol, informed by literature and consultations with young people (pre-study YPAG), can provide a template for planning and reporting coproduction in mental health studies of adolescence.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentMental HealthResearch DesignAdolescentFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSurveys and Questionnairesadolescent mental healthcoproductionlongitudinal studyprotocol

Identifiers

PMID40065653
PMCPMC11894036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.