ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
New-Onset, But Not Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Is a Significant Factor Contributing to Mortality Among Patients with Severe COVID-19.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in the general population and the most frequently presented arrhythmia in the intensive care unit. We investigated the effects of AF on the outcomes of critical COVID-19 patients, especially focusing on differences between chronic (CAF) and new-onset AF (NOAF) during critical disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this case-control study, we investigated the association of CAF and NOAF as an exposure, with in-hospital mortality as an outcome. We identified 2 patient groups, NOAF and CAF, which were compared with controls (all other hospitalized patients with critical COVID-19 pneumonia). No specific selection or matching was performed. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables; t test and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables, depending on distribution. P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the NOAF group, while in the CAF group, it was similar to that of the control group. The NOAF group had significantly higher markers of inflammation and more severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), measured with computed tomography. NOAF was strongly associated with in-hospital death, with OR 6.392 (95% CI, 2.758-14.815), P<0.000. In comparison, the CAF group was older and had more cardiovascular comorbidities, with similar markers of inflammation and severity of ARDS as the control group. CONCLUSIONS NOAF in COVID-19 was linked with significant risk of death, being a sign of extreme cardiac, pulmonary, and metabolic instability. NOAF should be considered as an important marker of instability and predictor of poor outcomes among patients with COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.