ArticleClinical genetics2025
Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, Treatment, and Prognosis of Children With Early-Onset (Neonatal) Marfan Syndrome.
Article in Clinical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-onset Marfan syndrome (eoMFS) is a severe and rare form of Marfan syndrome characterized by severe atrioventricular valve insufficiency developing before or shortly after birth. It is unclear which factors (interventions and/or genotype) influence survival. Forty-one individuals with eoMFS with a fibrillin-1 gene (FBN1) variant in exon 24-32 (CRCh37) were included. At the last follow-up, 14/41 (34%) were alive (8 months-18 years) and 27/41 (66%) were deceased. Median age of death was 1 month and 88% of the deaths occurred before 5 months of age. More individuals alive past the age of 16 months versus those who were deceased before that age had undergone cardiovascular surgery at an older age (13 months, range 3-72, vs. 2 months, range 2-2, p = 0.03). Survival was better in those with single amino acid substitutions/small in-frame deletions than in those with large in-frame deletions (p = 0.007), but variants involving a cysteine substitution in an EGF-like domain versus those involving other amino acids did not significantly influence survival. EoMFS ranges from a (pre-)neonatal life-threatening disorder to a disorder with enhanced survival, creating a window for cardiovascular surgery. Individuals with single amino acid substitutions/small in-frame deletions had better survival compared to those with variants significantly impacting exon 24-32 length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.