ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
Exploring the scope of inspiratory muscle training in difficult weaning: reflections on the multicentre RCT.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We commend the authors for their insightful study on inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in mechanically ventilated patients with difficult weaning, highlighting the robust use of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) as a key outcome. We suggest that a lower baseline maximum inspiratory pressure cutoff could better target patients with significant inspiratory dysfunction, improving the study's precision. Additionally, alternative imputation techniques, such as multiple imputation, could strengthen the handling of missing data. While the sample size calculation was appropriate, the unbalanced group sizes raise concerns about generalisability. Future research could benefit from subgroup analyses, individual response curves, and further investigation into the unexpected adverse effects observed in the low-intensity group to refine the inspiratory muscle training protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.