Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065389›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Artificial intelligence-driven translational medicine: a machine learning framework for predicting disease outcomes and optimizing patient-centric care.

Laith Abualigah, Saleh Ali Alomari, Mohammad H Almomani, Raed Abu Zitar, Kashif Saleem, Hazem Migdady, Vaclav Snasel, Aseel Smerat, Absalom E Ezugwu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laith AbualigahComputer Science Department, Al Al-Bayt University, Mafraq, 25113, Jordan. Aligah.2020@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-4549
Saleh Ali AlomariFaculty of Science and Information Technology, Jadara University, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Mohammad H AlmomaniDepartment of Mathematics, Facility of Science, The Hashemite University, P.O box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
Raed Abu ZitarFaculty of Engineering and Computing, Liwa College, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Kashif SaleemDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Applied Studies and Community Service, King Saud University, 11362, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hazem MigdadyCSMIS Department, Oman College of Management and Technology, 320, Barka, Oman.
Vaclav SnaselFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70800, Poruba-Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Aseel SmeratFaculty of Educational Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan.
Absalom E EzugwuUnit for Data Science and Computing, North-West University, 11 Hofman Street, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa. Absalom.ezugwu@nwu.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have revolutionized the medical field and transformed translational medicine. These technologies enable more accurate disease trajectory models while enhancing patient-centered care. However, challenges such as heterogeneous datasets, class imbalance, and scalability remain barriers to achieving optimal predictive performance.

methodsThis study proposes a novel AI-based framework that integrates Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to address these challenges. The framework was evaluated using two distinct datasets: MIMIC-IV, a critical care database containing clinical data of critically ill patients, and the UK Biobank, which comprises genetic, clinical, and lifestyle data from 500,000 participants. Key performance metrics, including Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and AUROC, were used to assess the framework against traditional and advanced ML models.

resultsThe proposed framework demonstrated superior performance compared to classical models such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Neural Networks. For example, on the UK Biobank dataset, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.96, significantly outperforming Neural Networks (0.92). The framework was also efficient, requiring only 32.4 s for training on MIMIC-IV, with low prediction latency, making it suitable for real-time applications.

conclusionsThe proposed AI-based framework effectively addresses critical challenges in translational medicine, offering superior predictive accuracy and efficiency. Its robust performance across diverse datasets highlights its potential for integration into real-time clinical decision support systems, facilitating personalized medicine and improving patient outcomes. Future research will focus on enhancing scalability and interpretability for broader clinical applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningPatient-Centered CareTranslational Research, BiomedicalTranslational Science, BiomedicalHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceClinical decision supportDisease predictionMachine learningTranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID40065389
PMCPMC11892274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.