ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Automated deep learning-based assessment of tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte density determines prognosis in colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning based on CD3 histological slides for prediction of colon cancer outcome: analysis of three international stage III colon cancer cohorts.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Review
- Digital Pathology and the AI-Based Quantification of the Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Tumor Budding and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes to Tertiary Lymphoid Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Estimating tumour immune infiltration: methodological convergence across histology and spatial technologies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into colorectal cancer reporting.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence based quantification of T lymphocyte infiltrate predicts prognosis in high grade breast cancer using deep learning and statistical validation.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Toward Artificial Intelligence in Oncology and Cardiology: A Narrative Review of Systems, Challenges, and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is a well-established prognostic biomarker across multiple cancer types, with higher TIL counts being associated with lower recurrence rates and improved patient survival. We aimed to examine whether an automated intraepithelial TIL (iTIL) assessment could stratify patients by risk, with the ability to generalise across independent patient cohorts, using routine H&E slides of colorectal cancer (CRC). To our knowledge, no other existing fully automated iTIL system has demonstrated this capability.
methodsAn automated method employing deep neural networks was developed to enumerate iTILs in H&E slides of CRC. The method was applied to a Stage III discovery cohort (n = 353) to identify an optimal threshold of 17 iTILs per-mm
resultsSignificant stratification was observed in terms of overall survival for a combined validation cohort univariate (HR 1.67, 95%CI 1.39-2.00; p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.13-1.66; p = 0.001) analysis. Our iTIL classifier was an independent prognostic factor within proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) Stage II CRC cases with clinical high-risk features. Of these, those classified as TIL-High had outcomes similar to pMMR clinical low risk cases, and those classified TIL-Low had significantly poorer outcomes (univariate HR 2.38, 95%CI 1.57-3.61; p < 0.001, multivariate HR 2.17, 95%CI 1.42-3.33; p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur deep learning method is the first fully automated system to stratify patient outcome by analysing TILs in H&E slides of CRC, that has shown generalisation capabilities across multiple independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.