ArticleBMC public health2025
Promoting active transportation through technology: a scoping review of mobile apps for walking and cycling.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncorporating active transportation (AT), such as walking and cycling, into daily routines is a promising solution for meeting the World Health Organization's physical activity recommendations and contributes to reducing the risk of many noncommunicable diseases. Smartphone apps offer versatile platforms for embedding health behavior promotion strategies to encourage AT.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to provide an overview of how mobile apps are being used to promote AT through reviews of the academic literature and commercial app stores.
methodsWe searched six academic databases (Embase, Medline, Web of Science, PsychINFO, Transport Database, and Google Scholar) for academic literature. The literature was included if it presented a developed app to promote AT behaviors. AT promotion strategies and theories were extracted and analyzed for their impact on changing behaviors and behavioral intentions toward AT. Commercial apps were searched in two app stores (the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store) across six countries, one per continent. Apps were included if they promoted and encouraged AT behavior. We evaluated the apps on the basis of user engagement and their quality and potential to change behaviors, as assessed via the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and the App Behavior Change Scale (ABACUS).
resultsThe academic literature search identified 38 articles, presenting 29 apps. All the studies that evaluated behavioral intentions reported success in raising awareness and changing behavioral intentions. A promising strategy to motivate behavior involves providing multiple relevant feedback (calories burned, money saved, time saved, and CO2/particulate matter emissions) on behavioral impacts alongside action plans (route recommendations and personalized travel plans). Only two apps from the literature search were publicly available. The commercial app search identified 78 apps. Apps with high-quality engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information presented greater user engagement than those that did not; therefore, they were more likely to succeed.
conclusionMobile apps have great potential to motivate changes and be part of a comprehensive system to promote AT. Given the rapid growth of app-based interventions, leveraging mobile apps to encourage AT warrants further exploration. Upon development, these apps should be maintained and made publicly accessible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.